AI-Powered Assessment Software

AI built into every layer of your assessment

From question creation to proctoring and grading, TestInvite applies AI across assessment workflows to reduce manual effort and support consistent, scalable assessment processes.

AI Question Generation
Active
AI Proctoring
Active
AI Grading
Active
AI Rubric Generation
Active
Consistent results

The same standard applied to every candidate, every time.

Reduced manual workload

AI handles monitoring and grading at scale, freeing reviewers for higher-value tasks.

Significant time savings

Spend less time on administration and more time on decision-making.

AI Question Generation

Generate assessment questions from a single prompt

Describe the knowledge, skills, difficulty level, topic, or any additional requirements in a single prompt. AI generates questions based on your instructions, helping you create assessments much faster while maintaining consistency.

The more specific your prompt, the more tailored your generated question will be.

Supported question types

Multiple choice Matching Short text Long text Numeric input
AI Question Generation
Prompt example
Create a multiple-choice question to assess leadership and decision-making skills. Requirements: - Difficulty level: Intermediate. - Include four answer options. - Mark the correct answer. - Base the question on a realistic workplace scenario.
AI Question Import

Import questions using AI

Generate new questions with AI using a text prompt, source files, or both. AI creates assessment-ready questions that you can review, edit, and save to your Question Bank.

Generate from prompts

Describe the topic, difficulty, learning objectives, question types, or number of questions you need. AI generates questions based on your instructions.

Generate from source materials

Upload PDFs, text files, or images, and AI uses the provided content to generate new questions.

Create multiple question types

Generate multiple choice, matching, short text, long text, and numeric questions from the same prompt or source material.

Review before saving

Every generated question can be reviewed and edited before being added to your Question Bank. AI can also assign folders, dimensions, and tags to help organize newly created questions.

AI Proctoring

Monitor every candidate, focus only on what matters

Scale exam monitoring with real-time AI analysis of candidate video. Automatically surface suspicious behavior, so reviewers spend time on high-risk sessions, not full recordings.

Person count

AI detects when no one is in front of the camera or when multiple people appear in the frame, helping reviewers quickly identify possible identity or supervision issues.

Identity check

AI compares the candidate's face with the ID photo captured at the beginning of the exam and flags potential identity mismatches for human review.

Face position

AI monitors whether the candidate remains visible and oriented toward the screen, flagging prolonged face absence, head turns, or off-screen attention for review.

Forbidden objects

AI detects prohibited items, such as mobile phones or books, appearing in the camera view and highlights the session for further review.

Voice activity

AI detects speech or conversations during the exam and flags the relevant moments for reviewer attention.

Muted microphone

AI identifies sessions where no audio is recorded, helping reviewers distinguish between microphone issues and attempts to bypass audio monitoring.

AI Proctoring — Session #4821
REC
Candidate: J. Morrison
00:42:17 elapsed · AI monitoring active
2 Alerts
Candidate ✓
Unknown!
14:23:41
AI Alert Log
RED FLAG — Multiple people in frame
14:23:41 · 2 individuals detected · Queued for review
ORANGE ALERT — Unusual head movement
14:19:05 · Repeated lateral movement · Logged
AI automatically performs a second verification pass to reduce false positives before human review.
Alert Classification

Risk-based alert classification

Red Flag

Potential cheating

High priority

Treated as high-risk and prioritized for review.

Identity does not match the ID photo
Another person appears in the camera frame
Face not visible during the exam
Orange Alert

Suspicious activity

Needs review

May indicate suspicious behavior and require further review.

Face turned away from the screen
Looking away from the screen
A phone or book visible in the camera frame
Someone talking during the exam
No audio recorded throughout the session

AI flags. Humans decide.

TestInvite follows an AI-assisted approach where artificial intelligence supports but never replaces human judgment. The AI continuously monitors the exam, flags potential issues, and organizes them for review. The final decision always rests with a human proctor, who evaluates each alert in context to ensure fairness.

Explore AI proctoring
100%
Human
final review
AI Grading

Grade open-ended responses with speed and consistency

Evaluate questions at scale. Apply the same criteria to every answer and generate structured, decision-ready results without manual grading bottlenecks.

01

You define the criteria

Provide the question, the evaluation criteria, and a scoring rubric. The more specific your instructions, the more consistent the output.

02

AI evaluates the response

The AI combines the candidate's answer with the question and your instructions, analyzing every response against the same standard without fatigue or bias.

03

Grade and feedback delivered

The system generates a grade together with written feedback explaining the reasoning behind each score, identifying strengths and highlighting areas for improvement.

AI Grading — Setup
Define evaluation criteria
Question
Describe the key factors that affect employee motivation in a modern remote-first organization.
Evaluation criteria
Award full marks for responses identifying at least 3 distinct factors with remote-specific reasoning. Deduct points for generic answers without supporting reasoning.
Scoring rubric
5
Excellent — all criteria met with depth
3
Adequate — most criteria met
1
Insufficient — generic, lacks reasoning
AI Evaluation — In Progress
Batch evaluation running
247 / 312 responses
Live evaluation feed
Candidate #247 — Evaluated
Score: 4/5 · Processing time: 1.2s
Candidate #246 — Evaluated
Score: 2/5 · Processing time: 0.9s
Evaluating Candidate #248...
247
Evaluated
3.6
Avg score
1.1s
Avg time
AI Grading Result
Candidate #247 — Sarah M.
Essay · Employee Motivation
4
/ 5
Feedback for candidate

Your response demonstrates a solid understanding of remote-work dynamics. You identified autonomy, communication tools, and recognition as key factors. To reach the highest mark, add specific examples to support your reasoning.

Rationale for administrator

3 of 4 criteria met. Response lacks specific examples. Score of 4/5 reflects strong conceptual grasp with minor gap in evidence, consistent with rubric level 4.

Supported Response Types

Every response type, consistently evaluated

The AI evaluates each response type according to the instructions and scoring guidelines you define.

Short answer

Assessed against your defined criteria and scoring rules, with consistent evaluation across all responses.

Long answer

Evaluated strictly based on your defined criteria, scoring rules, and instructions. The AI applies your evaluation logic consistently to every response.

Essays

Assessed according to the instructions and scoring guidelines you define. Whether you evaluate grammar, structure, coherence, or argument quality, the AI follows your instructions exactly.

Speaking

Audio responses are transcribed and evaluated based on your instructions. The AI applies your criteria for fluency, accuracy, and language use without deviation.

Video interview

Recorded responses are transcribed and evaluated using your defined instructions. The AI assesses the response strictly based on your scoring criteria.

Coding tasks

Submissions evaluated based on your requirements. The AI applies your rules for correctness, efficiency, and code quality consistently.

Model Flexibility

Use the right model for each evaluation task

TestInvite provides the flexibility to integrate with different AI models depending on your assessment needs, rather than locking you into a single provider.

Model choice
is flexible.
Evaluation logic
stays consistent.
TI
TestInvite
Settings
General
Question types
AI Grading
Notifications
Integrations
AI Grading Configuration
Select the AI model used to evaluate open-ended responses.
AI Model
G
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Active
G
Gemini
Google
Active
C
Claude
Anthropic
Active
Evaluation settings
Evaluation criteria
Unchanged
Scoring rubric
Unchanged
Evaluating with: Gemini (Google)
Save settings
Feedback

Every grade comes with an explanation

For the candidate

Shown after result release

Feedback highlights strengths, identifies weaknesses, and suggests areas for improvement.

Your result
4 / 5

Your response demonstrates solid understanding of the topic. To improve further, include specific examples that support your reasoning.

Strong conceptual understanding
Clear structure and logic
Lacks supporting examples

For the administrator

Full rationale, always auditable

A separate rationale explains why each score was assigned, so every grading decision is transparent and auditable.

Grading rationale
Auditable
Criterion met
3 of 4 key factors identified — autonomy, communication, recognition
Criterion partially met
No specific examples or case references provided
Score assigned
4/5 — consistent with rubric level 4 definition
Explore AI grading
AI Rubric Generation

Create structured evaluation rubrics with AI

Generate a scoring rubric from your assessment question. AI analyzes the question and proposes evaluation criteria, performance levels, and scoring guidance. You can also provide additional instructions to tailor the rubric to your evaluation approach.

Review and refine the generated rubric before saving and using it in your assessments.

AI Rubric Generation
Optional prompt example
Create a rubric to evaluate responses to the following interview question: "Describe a time you resolved a complex employee relations issue" Additional instructions: - Use four performance levels: Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor. - Include evaluation criteria with detailed performance descriptions. - Focus on problem analysis, resolution strategy, legal and ethical awareness, communication, and overall effectiveness.
Get Started

See the full platform in action

Talk to a TestInvite representative about how AI capabilities fit into your assessment workflow.

Book a demo Try for Free